|
|
|
| Research and Comparison of the Three-dimensional Color Doppler and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Fetal Malformation |
| Guangzhou Medical University the First Affiliated Hospital， Guangzhou 510000，China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective： To investigate and compare the application value of the three-dimensional color Doppler and the nuclear magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of fetal malformation. Then， to provide some reliable theoretical basis for the early clinical diagnosis and the proposals of prenatal and postnatal care. Method： 120 pregnant women who came to our hospital for prenatal ultrasound and were diagnosed with abnormal results from March 2012 to March 2014 and investigated. Three-dimensional color Doppler and nuclear magnetic resonance were separately used in order to diagnose fetal malformation. The pregnant women were given follow-up to postpartum or confirmed cases of odinopoeia. To learn the differences between the three-dimensional color Doppler and nuclear magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of fetal malformation， the detection rate， sensitivity， specificity and positive predictive value of the two diagnostic methods were compared and analyzed. Result： During the diagnosis of fetal malformation， the detection rate of the three-dimensional color Doppler was 67.92%（ 72/106）， the specificity was 81.30%， the sensitivity was 100%， the positive predictive value was 79.60% and the negative predictive value was 100%. The detection rate of the nuclear magnetic resonance was 84.91%（ 90/106）， the specificity was 89.60%， the sensitivity was 100%， the positive predictive value was 88.20% and the negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusion： In the diagnosis of the fetal malformation， the nuclear magnetic resonance has more apparent advantages. It can be united with the three-dimensional color Doppler to conduct antenatal fetal malformations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
. [J]. 中国医学创新, 2017, 12(29): 104-107. |
|
|
|
|
